Jaime v. Ashly, Round Two

If you're just tuning in, read my Jaime v. Ashly, Round One first and then go to ashlysmashly.blogspot.com and then come back and read this.

Ashly did have one very good and accurate point in her post refuting mine. I am way smarter than her. I'm glad she agrees. =) Basically, she agreed with me on every point, she just had a few things to add. A few things which I disagree with. They can all be disputed with two major points.
1. This movie was not supposed to be grounded in reality and would have been extremely boring if it had been.
2. This movie is not set in the current time. I'm not sure when it's supposed to be exactly, but they accepted artificial intelligence as same ol' same ol' so it's safe to say that it is sometime in the future. This succintly refutes her medical chainsaw argument. Who knows, there could be medical chainsaws in the future. The doctors acted like having to chop 4 metal arms off some dude was normal so it's safe to say that it had happened before.

Since it took her a billion trillion jajillion years to post her rebuttal I have lost my fervor for this argument so I'm going to end with this-I don't care what kind of crazy infection I get from his websemen, that's why we invented penicillin.