Worst. Loser. Ever.
This apparently is not my week for winning. I'm pretty sure I jinxed people simply by wanting them to win. Okay, it's not as bad as all that, but in the past week Kerry lost, Pulaski's Purple Pandas went down and the Vikings dropped to 5-3. All 3 were close, very close. All 3 brought to light, once again, what a terrible loser I am, I'm such a huge baby about it. I felt physically ill after we lost our dodgeball game last night. This was before I threw a temper tantrum. Sorry Dave! I guess it's because I won't have a chance to avenge the loss. And I think I covered my feelings on the election. Graceful loser, I am not. I think growing up in Marenisco should have taken care of my losses for a life time. The only thing we ever won was one single solitary tournament. I've also been a Vikings fan for my entire life, which, like Lee said, can be equated to being a Red Sox fan. Except the Vikings have NEVER won a championship. Hustle up boys, I'm probably not going to be alive for 80 some more years. I also voted for Al Gore last election. Damn. How many times can one person lose without feeling like a loser? I guess I have a few more times left in me, right now I think I'm a winner for sure. =)
Okay, enough of that. Here's an interesting statistic. In a 1948 survey this guy found the 8% of males in America had had sex with an animal. 8%!!!!!!!!! There were probably like, say, 200 million people in America back there, that's 16 MILLION people having sex with animals. SIXTEEN MILLION. I think it was like 3.2% of women. That's 6.4 MILLION women. First of all, how does this work? And second, was life so different back then that they couldn't find a man to have sex with? Because I'm pretty sure that's not a big problem for chicks right about now. If they're so non-discriminating that they'll have sex with a barnyard animal then the high school janitor should be a huge step up. After the statistic they did qualify that the statistic has decreased because farms are disappearing. Do only 8 million men have sex with animals now? Sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick SICK!
And, once again, that's enough of that.
4 Comments:
Yux, where in the world did you find a stat like that? In the "How To Screw Your Farm Animal Manual"? Hehehe...just kidding I'm in a strange ass mood.
Can I just say also that that statistic probably doesn't include the small tribes that send their women away to be stitched up to the size of a drinking straw...you damn well know they're wives aren't putting out...now if only they could find that really good looking monkey that was eating out of the sewage earlier....yea, I agree dude, thats some sick shit..and I do believe I just made it grosser...more gross :)
At least you and I aren't complete losers....we still did good at Trivia :) Granted we may have cheated a little....but isn't the phrase you're not playing unless you're cheating!
I just read your last two posts. A couple of things:
a)No president can tank the economy all by himself.
b)Budget surpluses equal one thing by definition = Overtaxation.
c)Nothing is as sad as that guy's family on the news who was born in 1919, was a Sox fan his entire life and died this spring. Lived 85 years and never got to see a championship.
Nate
Post a Comment
<< Home